Some ideas that I’ll never get around to. I mentioned this in another thread, but I think it deserves one of its own. It’s kind of U.S.-centric, but might have applications elsewhere.
Tomato wine:
In light of the impending damage to the wine industry caused by the spotted lanternfly, tomatoes are an excellent replacement. Here’s why:
-
The result is very close to typical white wine from grapes. I’ve made 15 gallons of the stuff, which isn’t a huge sample size, but I <3 my liver. There’s no tomato taste at all, and flavor is enhanced by adding tannins (tea bags, oak leaves, etc.). @screedius
-
There’s huge unexplored potential for genetic improvement to enhance yield, flavor, nutrition value, etc. Someone will probably steal this idea, make a few GMOs and patent the whole thing, but hey, welcome to capitalism. Just let me drive the tractor during harvest time and all will be forgiven.
A crack-resistant determinate variety with high sugar content, disease resistance, anthocyanins, and high flavinoid content would be ideal.
-
Time from planting to harvest is much faster, and yields are much larger. Yes, tomatoes are a resource-intensive crop, but so are grapes, and because tomatoes have a wider tolerance range of soil and environmental conditions, they could shift wine production out of the drought-stricken western U.S. and into, say, Appalachia, which will see a precipitation increase in the future.
A good grape harvest is 5 tons an acre. A good tomato harvest is >40 tons an acre. Of course you have to factor in different amounts of irrigation, fertilizer, etc., but I’d wager that tomatoes are less resource-intensive than grapes. @lordcaravan
-
Diverting tomato juice for wine production can increase the efficiency of the production of other tomato products. Sauce, paste, etc.
Tiger milk:
An almond milk replacement. It’s no secret that almond production uses godawful amounts of water, yet there’s a highly productive competitor waiting in the wings: Tiger nuts, A.K.A., chufas. Cyperus esculentus. Tiger nuts + water + blender = tiger milk. The benefits:
-
It has extremely high caloric yield per acre, plus, time from planting to harvest is short, so one can harvest multiple plantings a year.
The potential for intercropping is excellent. Duckweed, in particular, would be a prolific, high protein companion that could at minimum serve as high quality livestock feed.
-
It’s a perennial with a wider geographic range and hardiness. This is a wetland plant and would thus be resource intensive depending on where it’s grown (keep in mind that it produces more calories per acre than, ahem, rice), however, that’s mitigated by the aforementioned intercropping, and the following:
-
Integrated agro-filtration of water. Nutrient runoff is probably the biggest source of pollution on the planet. What’s a natural filter that removes those nutrients from the system? Wetlands. Why not eat the results?
-
This is an unimproved crop with huge genetic potential.
-
Charlie Sheen can be our spokesman!
“Mini macadamias:”
Imagine a small nut that tasted very much like a macadamia, with a much thinner, easier to crack shell, that grew in drought-striken areas with poor soils and no irrigation. Not only that, but it would grow in the continental U.S., with a much wider hardiness/geographic range than genuine macadamias, making it a competitor to resource-intensive domestic almond production, but to macadamia imports as well. Like the others, it’s an unimproved crop, with unexplored genetic potential.
Its name is yellowhorn, Xanthoceras sorbifolium.
No, it’s not native to the U.S., but just review my posts here to get my thoughts on that aspect: https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/the-case-against-killing-spotted-lanternflies/35519/90
I think it’s well worth it.
Need I also mention that they grow well on relatively steep slopes? Again, seems like a good fit for Appalachia, which is ironically an economically depressed region due to the decline of coal/fossil fuels, generally speaking.