looking at the comments in another observation from the same set (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/47718596), it looks like these observations may have originally been created with 1601 as the observation date iNaturalist. so i think that’s the issue.
Written before pisum’s reply: Hmm, that is strange. The error could either be in the Darwin Core Archive iNat prepares for GBIF: http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/gbif-observations-dwca.zip (clicking will start a huge download—I don’t think my computer has enough free space for it at the moment!) or GBIF’s ingestion of it.
Good to know the likely source of the problem. There are often weird early dates in the GBIF dataset that seem to be corrected quickly enough that I can’t find them on iNaturalist when I search, e.g. 0002