What happens to positional accuracy when a species is unobscured?

Am I reading various records of species that have been unobscured in Ontario that when this happens, the accuracy is set to a value of 27.66 km ?

If that is the case, maybe it is better to simply null it out, especially given various discussions / proposals to not maop records with high values in this field, assuming the original value entered by the observer is not available to put back in ?

I’m wondering if it’s displaying wrong in some places, but working in others? When this became unobscured, the accuracy field stayed at 29.89 km, but the circle drawn on the map is the correct size.

Yeah, looks like just a bug where the number displayed is wrong. The actual mapping appears to show whatever accuracy the observer entered.

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.