Add search feature in "Favorites"

#1

I fav a lot of images for various reasons: I think they’d be good images for Taxon Pages; they are of a weird organism I’d like to help ID later; I might use them in school assignments; they just look nice/funny; etc. However, I now have so many (27 pages worth) that it has become hard to find specific images.

It would nice if there was a search feature on Favorites that would allow me to find specific images more quickly. It doesn’t have to be elaborate: just being able to search by taxon would be appreciated, but I’m curious to know if others may want this feature too.

#2

I like this idea as well, since I also have quite a few pages worth of faves.

1 Like
#3

A feature request (or maybe it was just an old Google group thread) was made for adding categories to the favourites, like “id later”, “funny obs”, “check this one”, etc. I imagine it would work similar to how tags work, but would be private to the IDer…

1 Like
#4

I’d prefer to be able to sort by my own custom categories, but I’d settle for a generic taxon categorisation. We have taxon categorisation on Lists and projects, just copy that format across to the favourites system, no? (Or, reverse, convert system so favourites are saved as a list so it can utilise the taxon sorting)

Some (any!) sort of categorisation is urgently needed though. I can’t even sort/search by date or keyword its absurd.

#5

The idea of it being “tag based” would mean you have complete freedom in how you categorize them, just as the observer does with the current tag system. Have a play with tags on your own observations to see what I mean, and then imagine a similar (but separate) functionality from the identifiers perspective

#6

i think this would take favorites further down a path they probably were never intended to go. i’m guessing that the old style projects are more what the iNat designers wanted to allow you to collect and categorize observations, but they probably provide a little too much functionality in some respects and are probably a little too unwieldy in many cases.

i think to achieve the ability to categorize observations, it’s better to extend the functionality of the observation subscriptions (see #2 in https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/notifications-on-inaturalist-please-share-your-ideas/374/37). then if you want to build search functionality on top of that, i think that’s probably the best path.

1 Like
#7

I dunno. The tag capability is there, you just have to duplicate it for this purpose. It would effectively replace the favourites system, because you could add your own tags to obs, which would be visible on the observation page only to yourself, and you could click those to go to a search result that matches, just like you do for the tags now. Once you “check this one later”, you can delete the tag to have it drop off that category, so to speak… I would imagine that instead of adding tags at the time of uploading the observation, the IDer tags could be added at the time you make the identification (on the identify page) or directly from the observation view, in a similar way that the observer can add them to their own observations.

Just thinking outside the box, because the two tag systems would be near identical in how they operate, maybe there could be the ability to “publish” tags and make them searchable under both systems. They would by default be private to the tag setter, but they could toggle them to be openly searchable. There are many users that include tags for a number of useful things that could benefit others, like flower colour, or being from a particular reserve, etc. It then becomes borderline like the field system, with the ability to have them remain locked and controllable by the setter (eg an identifier).

#8

hmm, you can do that now with fields, and just make up your own field, some people turn off field adding to their observations but I feel like that is rare? And it’s true everyone could see it but you could use numbers or something. I’m sure some existing field could be used

2 Likes
#9

yeah, but fields can be edited and seen by anyone, this would be just like tags, except instead of only editable by observer, they would be only editable (and visible) to the reviewer, ie yourself…

1 Like
#10

so it would be:

  • observation tags for observers only
  • review tags for anyone else looking at the observation (and you could use them like favourite categories)
  • and fields viewable and settable by anyone
1 Like
#11

Related feature request: ‘Like’ and ‘Bookmark’ buttons

(I use the favorites tool as a “like” and not a bookmark, so I wouldn’t find this particularly useful myself.)

2 Likes
#12

But what the tags idea would do is free up the current favourites feature to be more specifically a “likes” :) It could even be renamed to “Like” for clarity

1 Like