Yes, but there are people dedicated to actively reduce the amount of observations not identified, or identified as “State of matter Life”. The need exists.
It reminds me this discussion, among others :
Amount of “Unknown” records is decreasing
BTW, one should include also in the scope all observations identified as “Plant” or “Animal”, if not flagged as “Based on the evidence, can the Community Taxon still be confirmed or improved?” / “No”. But no need to detail all use cases, because once we have a filter based on computer vision, it will be easy to combine it with other filters (“unknown”, “plant”, “animal”, “can be improved”, etc) and do whatever we wish.