I´d love to know if any of these issues are resolvable at iNaturalists end…
Are any of them issues that limit data flow in other countries that might be addressed any time soon?
At the very least point 5 sounds plausible to resolve at one end?!
Point 7 is a non-issue IMO. I’ve made bad identifications and uploaded them in iRecord just as I have here! Perhaps more simply just related to iNaturalists broader user base. From one identifier I heard mentioning this, it also seemed to be related to a glut of bad autosuggests - which in the instance he mentioned is already significantly better… and will only continue to develop with time as the ML resolves common species.
Point 2 I wonder about also - one identifier on iRecord forum discussing this said it was fairly simple to resolve using existing filters when importing.
I think @bazwal said on another thread that he is uploading to both… which I´m currently considering.
I tried downloading a spreadsheet from iNaturalist and then uploading it into iRecord, but this so far seems very difficult due to iRecords photo upload limitations via spreadsheet…
Also slightly frustrating if some of the architecture for this is already in place and just needs fine-tuning!..(or will be resolved in the near future).