I had to add parameter reviewed=any to the above query to obtain any output. But no, using taxon_id instead of ident_taxon_id is too restrictive. Too many observations are lost as a result.
Yes, that is precisely the list I’m interested in but of course it lacks the comfort of the Identify tool, which is a showstopper.
Thanks to both of you for assistance. In the end, I used the original query to review about 18 pages of observations. Close enough, I guess.
I believe this is as close as possible to what you’re trying to get, in the Identify tab: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?reviewed=any&quality_grade=needs_id%2Cresearch&ident_user_id=trscavo&ident_taxon_id=53789&exact_taxon_id=53789 reviewed=any or “yes” will make sure it doesn’t hide the observations you’ve ID’d quality_grade=needs_id%2Cresearch shows everything besides Casual observations ident_user_id=trscavo is self explanatory ident_taxon_id=53789 restricts it to observations of which Tiarella cordifolia has been suggested exact_taxon_id=53789 is what restricts it to observations which are currently EXACTLY at Tiarella cordifolia
This leaves you with ~15 pages instead of 18. There are a few faults, mainly being that the ID suggestions can be from anybody, and that this doesn’t show you observations that you ID’d as Tiarella cordifolia but someone disagreed with. I don’t know if there’s a solution for the former, but the latter is resolved by simply looking through your notifications and fixing said observations outside of the Identify tab.