I’m sure the answer is obvious and simple, but I am very puzzled to find that there are ~211 observations of cultivated roses (Rosa sp.) in the Fungi of the California Floristic Province project.
Given the taxa- inclusion criteria for observations in the project… why are they there?? As far as I can tell, all the other observations in the project are in fact fungi.
Thanks! I was wondering if that might be the case, but I thought that if it were, I’d also see other examples of plant pathogens getting re-identified as plants showing up in the project.
Maybe not so common because of the Captive/Cultivated nature of these Rosa?
My recommendation would be to use the universal metadata tool to bulk remove observations from traditional projects. If you want to discuss that tool, I think probably the conversation should move to that topic.
The other option is a bit more technical, but for those who feel up to running code, see here.