Was Your State a Slacker? - 2024 USA Observations Per Capita (Edit: Canadian data and European/African maps now in comments!)

Born and raised in Bradford County, Pa,. Most of the observations up there are probably mine or one other observer, though there are a few others in the western part of the county. It’s very rural and fairly empty–either farmland, forest , or swamp. I love, love, love looking for observations there because so many odd things pop up–often in my parents yard (e.g. forcepflies and emerald day moths). I suspect Tioga has more observations because it’s the location of a university and the PA Grand Canyon. It attracts tourists who like the outdoors. In fact I love looking for stuff in PA, in general, because so few people are doing the same thing. I’m not tripping over anybody and feel like I really am adding some knowledge about the area by loading up observations, especially for places like Bradford County, PA. Up there, people hunt or fish, but don’t really report on their catches. DE has some fun stuff, but there are more people, fewer areas to comb, and more observers so less “new” things to see. Honestly, I don’t mind if we are slackers–it’s kind of fun looking in less traveled spaces.

4 Likes

Really cool! Thanks for sharing!

1 Like

Thanks for all the identifying you do for PA too!

1 Like

Maine’s lagging behind… I’d better get to work!

2 Likes

I checked my NL numbers and corrected the table. If you use the Places filter under More Filters, it uses the correct outline. Using the standard Location search just gives you a box, not sure what’s up with that.

Small population, lots of tourists.

1 Like

I made a map for my home state of Missouri’s observations, but now you’ve made me want to make another for observations per observer for Missouri counties! Curse my love for maps and charts!

For anyone wondering, the blue counties in the bottom right have low populations and high observations because of Mark Twain National Forest and a couple other state parks in that area as well, at least that’s my guess as to why they blow the other counties out of the water.

5 Likes

I can think of a few other reasons for those blue counties on bottom. The Ozark National Scenic Riverways there is well worth a visit, and there is an introduced elk population in the area which probably brings a few tourists. Last April’s solar eclipse was also visible from that area, and that’s where I traveled to see it (along with many others, including one man I met who traveled there from Alaska). MDC (MO Dept. of Conservation) also brings in lots of seasonal field technicians to work on research projects in that area, many of whom probably use iNaturalist.

2 Likes
  1. Nebraska

I took a trip to Nebraska in 2023 to visit family and noticed that I was the top observer for several species after making just a handful of observations. Guess Nebraska being 48th goes some way towards explaining that.

I created a observations per observer map just now:

I completely forgot about the eclipse, tiwane posted something about how almost all places within the eclipse range had high numbers, and I know a good amount of people who went down that way to watch it. This map follows the eclipse theme (more or less), and all your other points also make a lot of sense and fit with this map! Although, I wonder what’s going on in Texas County - there’s a lot more observations per observer than any other county (63 compared to 25 or less everywhere else).

EDIT: Table is wrong, it flipped my alphabetical list

EDIT AGAIN: Table is now correct

Rough table I just figured out how to do
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4
Adair 26.875
Andrew 4.825
Atchison 8.2
Audrain 11.15384615
Barry 15.47133758
Barton 15.96907216
Bates 7
Benton 10.09638554
Bollinger 4.5
Boone 20.26690821
Buchanan 12.38888889
Butler 9.024691358
Caldwell 2.545454545
Callaway 6.888888889
Camden 7.981884058
Cape Girardeau 12.82687339
Carroll 10.16666667
Carter 12.73584906
Cass 10.79338843
Cedar 11.10169492
Chariton 6.703703704
Christian 12.38461538
Clark 5.294117647
Clay 12.97337278
Clinton 7.391304348
Cole 12.33809524
Cooper 3.35
Crawford 6.573033708
Dade 25.11764706
Dallas 9.506666667
Daviess 7
DeKalb 14.35
Dent 29.98648649
Douglas 11.825
Dunklin 17.2173913
Franklin 22.87426326
Gasconade 3.898305085
Gentry 10.64705882
Greene 16.66101695
Grundy 7.375
Harrison 8.790697674
Henry 17.640625
Hickory 18.69565217
Holt 7.977011494
Howard 9.010526316
Howell 12.44117647
Iron 9.7
Jackson 11.94162437
Jasper 12.60119048
Jefferson 18.45421903
Johnson 19.37426901
Knox 4.666666667
Laclede 6.941747573
Lafayette 15.79245283
Lawrence 20.42105263
Lewis 12.5
Lincoln 13.15068493
Linn 6.425
Livingston 3.7
Macon 6.25
Madison 6.073684211
Maries 6.925
Marion 3.915492958
McDonald 25.93243243
Mercer 2.444444444
Miller 7.768292683
Mississippi 18.06666667
Moniteau 3.423076923
Monroe 3.290322581
Montgomery 18.78666667
Morgan 10.67105263
New Madrid 9.347826087
Newton 26.71287129
Nodaway 6.137931034
Oregon 11.65714286
Osage 7.16
Ozark 7.622641509
Pemiscot 5
Perry 3.578947368
Pettis 11.94117647
Phelps 18.87614679
Pike 6.97826087
Platte 7.818452381
Polk 18.58947368
Pulaski 7.288888889
Putnam 5.5
Ralls 3.409090909
Randolph 5.230769231
Ray 6.333333333
Reynolds 10.1
Ripley 10.46666667
St. Charles 19.32886724
St. Clair 31.80769231
St. Francois 9.71686747
St. Louis County 15.57886244
St. Louis 11.00984529
Ste. Genevieve 13.6519337
Saline 6.552238806
Schuyler 1.375
Scotland 4.416666667
Scott 21.31707317
Shannon 14.10313901
Shelby 3.384615385
Stoddard 13.73529412
Stone 5.096428571
Sullivan 10.5
Taney 15.39613527
Texas 68.29885057
Vernon 8.658536585
Warren 10.36912752
Washington 9.903225806
Wayne 6.759615385
Webster 11.98550725
Worth 2.714285714
Wright 6.166666667
1 Like

Iowan here–I contributed 10052 of those 94324 observations! And I’m still going through photos–only up to mid-October so far!

4 Likes

washington needs to step up the game! unfortunately between school and the winter weather and lack of mushrooms, January has been a pretty dead month for me iNat wise. Maybe this weekend that’ll change!

2 Likes

“The dominance of the Yukon ratio at the top of the “leaderboard” is almost certainly due to the efforts of previous Yukon Conservation Data Centre Coordinator Bruce Bennett in encouraging as many residents and visitors to use the app as possible.”
Goals

I’m surprised Austria is the all green country in the center, my impression living here is not many people know about inaturalist - but I may live in the wrong area? Made a map of just Austria:

Which is not enlightening at all, I assumed Vienna would be the only green place, instead it’s all red, it had only 66k obs in 2024 and at the same time most people live there. And Salzburg where my own observations go to - is somewhere in the middle.

numbers
Wien 2006134 66706 0.0332510191243456
Niederösterreich 1723981 168938 0.0979929593191572
Oberösterreich 1530571 26145 0.0170818602991955
Steiermark 1269945 224400 0.176700565772533
Tirol 776082 68528 0.0882999476859404
Salzburg 571528 15783 0.0276154449125852
Kärnten 569835 36980 0.0648959786604894
Vorarlberg 409951 17498 0.0426831499374315
Burgenland 301966 54789 0.181440956928926

Thanks comradejon, loustinaforest, pisum for the thread and links, I love these kinds of things!

5 Likes

That, plus a bit of spillover from Hamburg I guess. Myself having contributed to both effects.

There are indeed many many biases with this sort of data visualization, hence your surprise, and mine too. Not a problem really, provided we keep caveats in mind. Let’s not state the obvious (population size, natural attractiveness, observers’ self-selection etc.). I fear hyperactive naturalists visiting the country may spend more of their holidays in the Tauern mountains than at the Konzerthaus in downtown Vienna ;)

It’s interesting to compare places that seem roughly similar in population size/structure + visitors numbers + natural attractiveness. Capital city to capital city, desert county vs. desert county next to it, alpine touristic park here vs. alpine touristic park there, etc.

i suspect the City Nature Challenge helped the number of observation for Austria as a whole last year. Graz and Salzburg were the first european cities in the observation leaderboard https://www.citynaturechallenge.org/past-results

1 Like

Biodiversity capital of Europe ?

It just occurred to me that one of the (many) uses of all these analyses and maps is that they can point us to where more iNat observations might be needed. I don’t have the time to pull together data for my state, but when I look at a map of Research Grade plant observations in Massachusetts, I can see that Bristol County and southern Worcester County could use some work.

2 Likes

Hey @elias105 - These maps are so much fun! The data you used for Austria looks solid, but there’s something weird going on with your map - not sure what happened.

On your scale, red=more, green=less (reversed from the other maps), but the actual colors for the states mostly reflect green=more. I say mostly though, because that isn’t quite right, either - according to the data, for example, Salzburg has the 2nd-least number of observations, and Burgenland has the most, but the colors aren’t reflecting that.

I messed around in Datawrapper for a bit, trying to replicate your map set-up, but still haven’t figured out what happened - haven’t managed to replicate!

2 Likes