Another example is Lincoln Co., Colorado (place ID=249). It cannot be called up in Identify by typing it into the place box (not under Filters, either). It can be called up in Explore, though, as with the previous example. This is another county name that repeats itself over a dozen times in various U.S. states. Not sure whether that is a contributing factor that causes this bug to occur.
(I merged this with an existing report that has the same root cause.)
There are about 160 counties with this same problem. Last I heard, the suggested solution from staff is to ask individually to have it fixed when you encounter one of the problem counties.
Thank you so much! Hate to bother you again, but could you please do the same for Montgomery, Morgan, and Jackson Counties, Kentucky? Sorry to pester you so much
Hello! I am having this exact problem with Washington County, Missouri. I am trying to create a Project for aforementioned county, and it is not showing up whatever I do. Any help will be appreciated :)
for folks who don’t want to wait for staff to do whatever they do to allow a particular place to show up, it’s possible to add places to a collection project via the API. this describes one workflow to add taxa to a collection project: https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/moving-a-list-to-a-project/64938/2. to add a place instead of taxa, just adapt step #4 to use an appropriate rule definition for your place.
then look to see if you have any places already defined in your project. if you don’t have any places already in your project, then you would use this rule definition in step #4, replacing 0 with whatever the numeric ID of your place is:
source_rules['place']['include']['ids'] = [0]
if you already have places defined in your project and wish to preserve them while adding your new place, then use this rule definition instead, replacing 0 with whatever the numeric ID of your place is: