Please fill out the following sections to the best of your ability, it will help us investigate bugs if we have this information at the outset. Screenshots are especially helpful, so please provide those if you can.
Platform (Android, iOS, Website):
App version number, if a mobile app issue (shown under Settings or About):
Browser, if a website issue (Firefox, Chrome, etc) :
URLs (aka web addresses) of any relevant observations or pages:
Screenshots of what you are seeing (instructions for taking a screenshot on computers and mobile devices: https://www.take-a-screenshot.org/):
Description of problem (please provide a set of steps we can use to replicate the issue, and make as many as you need.):
Step 1: What the hell?
Step 2: On my computer (nothing at all to do with my pc), I frequently get white birds automatically identified as âcabbage whiteâ butterfly, an entirely inappropriate and inaccurate identification. Pressing âxâ to delete that, the suggested ID is often (not always) correct. This is not the only instance: Pink-eared ducks are automatically identified as âPinkâ, the flower. Oh dear.
Step 3: Goodness knows what I need to do now. I quite probably have not found the ideal method to do this, failed to find or read lengthy and rather unhelpful screens, and the relatively byzantine way of raising an issue (if Iâve actually found the right place) has made it rather user unfriendly, at least for me. I canât take a screen shot, having submitted my pics before (whoops) not during submission.
If your picture files are named, iNat will helpfully offer that.
You can start your birds at Aves, then the suggestions will fit âavesâ. Always better to start the CV with a broad taxon and the location. I checked 2 of your obs, CV is going straight to your chosen species now.
Yes, this was one of the features that while obvious in retrospect, was not obvious to me when I first started on iNat. I had many a mis-ID because Iâd inaccurately or vaguely named the files I uploaded. When I give iNat presentations to docents and volunteers, this is one of the most commonly perceived âflawsâ that attendees encounter or report.
My personal âfavouriteâ is that any Coccinellid in which the file name is written as XX-Spot Ladybird is uploaded as âSpot Croakerâ - a fish!
The most annoying thing is that many ladybird scientific names are so long! Itâs still easier to call the file âXX-Spot Ladybirdâ and then try to remember to adjust the fish IDs than it is to try to get around it by attempting to type out scientific names like âSubcoccinella vigintiquatuorpunctataââŚ
You could try âsub vigiâ or similar - thatâs enough of a prompt to get S. vigintiquatorpunctata to come up in search, so maybe itâll work in a file name too?