Mobile-friendly website (responsive)



I know that this is a big endeavour but I think it would be nice if the website would use a responsive design for mobile devices.



I guess this isn’t a very “sexy” feature request, but I’m still surprised at how few votes there are as far as how important this would be for improving user experience for a really large number of people.

By the way @iPhil after you create a feature request, you have to separately vote on it, if you want to (just in case you weren’t yet aware).



I think I thought it was about the app, which I don’t use. So this is just referring to a design that would work better on a mobile device, and is not referring to the app?

1 Like


Right! Making the website easier to see/use from a mobile device.



yeah i feel like i am reasonably tech savvy but have no idea what ‘responsive design for mobile devices’ even means so i didn’t vote for it

1 Like


fundamentally, it seems like you would want to be able to use your phone to, say, take photos, and i think that sort of thing would be most easily accomplished in a dedicated app. so if you’re going to do an app anyway, i think there’s less incentive to make sure the website will also work well on that mobile device. i’m not against the principle of a mobile-friendly website, but i just think there are probably higher priority things to do with limited manpower. maybe if they are going to overhaul a page anyway, it wouldn’t hurt to also work in mobile friendly features, but I don’t think it would necessarily make sense to overhaul a page just to work that in.

1 Like


I wonder how many of the users who would benefit most from this (and I’m sure there are many) – those who browse mainly from their smartphones – even see or get on this forum?

That may be something staff should take into account besides just “counting votes.”

1 Like


the app works great for adding observations, in my opinion anyhow, but not very well for perusing other people’s data, editing one’s own observations (especially if you have lots) or doing ID help. It would be neat if it worked better for those, though not crucial

1 Like


I don’t use the app at all for making observations since I use a regular camera and download pics onto my computer. I do use it on a tablet for checking for updates on my content and to see what other people are seeing in the area. Occasionally for identifications for others also. Sometimes if I want to look up some species info through the app it opens up the full website in the tablet’s browser and I agree that it’s difficult to use, because it doesn’t adapt the layout for the small screen size.

I wish the app could have all the functionality of the full website, but realize that would make it far too large and complicated of an app. One idea would be to have more than one app for different purposes that are linked. One with a focus on making observations and another one that focuses on doing identifications. A button in one app could open the other so it would appear seamless. If there was an app to do ids that works as well as the website I would do a lot more ids, because I wouldn’t have to be sitting at my computer to do them.



A mobile-friendly Identify page would be at the top of my list. :heart_eyes:



me too but my request only got three votes!



yeah, app requires separate development for Android and iOS tho, so seems more pie in the sky to me, but I could be wrong!



I have changed the title to make it more clear.

I agree that the focus probably doesn’t lie on the on a mobile-friendly website if there’s an app available.
Many features aren’t available in the app though and I find it cumbersome to use the website on the phone.

1 Like


Would it not be easier to expand the app so that the missing features were present there? Developing a mobile version of a website not intended for mobile view is quite time-consuming.

My main request is being able to see my message inbox and reply to/send messages on the app.



Remember too that there are two apps, with separate development pathways.